Evaluation and other Technical Reports

Dogwood Blossom

Learn, Practice, Share: A Comparative Review of The Pillowcase Project

David Selby & Fumiyo Kagawa. Global Disaster Preparedness Center (GDPC), Washington D.C. 107pp.


This is an output from a 2016 partnership between Sustainability Frontiers and the Global Disaster Preparedness Center (GDPC), a joint venture of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and American Red Cross. This report presents key insights and findings from a comparative review of the Pillowcase Project, a structured (Learn, Practice and Share), active and child-centered disaster preparedness program for children generally aged 8 to 11 (grades 3-5). First developed in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 by the Southeast Louisiana Red Cross Chapter, it had spread across the USA and subsequently moved on to international piloting by Red Cross national societies in six jurisdictions: Australia, Hong Kong, Mexico, Peru, the United Kingdom and Vietnam.

This review includes case studies from the originating country, the USA, and the six piloting jurisdictions, each highlighting the unique development and implementation strategies and styles adopted as well as factors influencing decisions made and directions taken. A critical, comparative discussion of findings relating to principal facets of the Pillowcase Project together with 18 recommendations follows.

http://preparecenter.org/resources/comparative-review-pillowcase-project

 

Disaster Risk Reduction in the School Curriculum, the Present and Potential Role of Development Agencies and the implications for the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 Successor

By Fumiyo Kagawa & David Selby, UNISDR, Geneva,  2015, 47pp.

This Input Paper for the Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015, commissioned by Plan International Sweden, examines disaster risk reduction (DRR) pre-school, school and post-secondary curricular provision in four South Asian and South East Asian countries (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia and Pakistan) while also reviewing inter-linkages between DRR teaching and learning and other components of a comprehensive approach to DRR in school and community. It also explores how development agencies are contributing – and might in the future contribute – to DRR curriculum development. It concludes by flagging the implications of the study for the successor document to the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015.

The Global Assessment Report
was designed to inform the deliberations of the UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR) held March 14-18, 2015 in Sendai, Japan.

To access the document, click here.

 

 

 

 

Child-Friendly Schooling for Peacebuilding

By David Selby & Fumiyo Kagawa, UNICEF, New York, 2014, 124pp

This cutting-edge volume critically examines UNICEF child-friendly school theory and practice from a peacebuilding perspective and offers some twenty-eight illustrative case studies from countries experiencing or emerging from conflict in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Middle East and South-eastern Europe.  After examining key principles, key concepts and primary features of both the child-friendly school and peacebuiilding education, and having advanced a socio-ecological model of transformative educational change, the authors explore different elements of the child-friendly school through a peacebuilding lens identifying whether each elements is 'peacebuilding resonant' or of 'peacebuilding latent' potential or whether it constitutes a 'peacebuilding gap.  School-level elements explored are school physical environment; school culture; curriculum; child-centered learning; student participation at school and in the community; the school as a community hub; the school as a learning organization. System-wide elements explored include: teacher professional development, the use of situation analyses, multi-sector and multi-level partnership approaches, national policy development, national-level child-friendly school teams, and national-level monitoring and evaluation.  Risks and vulnerabilities that might follow from the application of child-friendly schooling for peacebuilding are then enumerated.  The main text ends with recommendations for making child-friendly schooling more peacebuilding resonant. The publication also includes user friendly standards and indicators for child-friendly schools for peacebuilding in post-conflict context.    

In English

https://www.unicef.org/education/files/Child-Friendly_Schooling_for_Peacebuilding.pdf

In French
http://unicef.sectae.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CFS-Full-Report_FRENCH_Final.pdf

 

Towards a Learning Culture of Safety and Resilience: Technical Guidance for Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction in the School Curriculum

By David Selby & Fumiyo Kagawa, UNESCO/UNICEF, 2014, 229pp.

Towards a Learning Culture of Safety and Resilience: Technical Guidance for Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction in the School Curriculum (Pilot Version)

By David Selby & Fumiyo Kagawa, UNESCO/UNICEF, 2013, 192pp.

This groundbreaking document, the outcome of a UNESCO/UNICEF consultancy to develop technical guidance for ministries of education, other educational jurisdictions, international and national non-governmental organizations and those in multiplier positions within education, offers in-depth guidance on integrating disaster risk reduction in school curricula.   It first offers a rationale for disaster risk reduction education (DRRE) explaining the benefits of introducing disaster risk reduction (DRR) into the curriculum within an Education for Sustainable Development frame and, more broadly, within a quality education framework that also includes climate change education, life skills education and child-friendly education.  It goes on to: present a typology and discussion of different approaches and strategies for integrating DRR in the curriculum
; give guidance on the formulation of DRR curriculum goals and grade-related learning objectives
; demonstrate alternative teaching approaches, alternative ways of sequencing knowledge, skills and attitudinal development, and different ways of progressing learning materials development
; provide benchmarks and reference standards for monitoring and evaluating student progress
; showcase relevant planning, assessment, review and discussion tools relating to DRR curriculum development
; provide case study examples of successful integration of DRR into school curricula and practice
; offer guidance on the scaling up and mainstreaming of DRR curriculum initiatives within education systems; demonstrate how to monitor and evaluate DRR curriculum change.

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002293/229336e.pdf

Pilot Version
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002194/219412e.pdf



Enhancing Child-centered Disaster Risk Reduction for Safe Schools: Insights from Cambodia, China and Indonesia

By Fumiyo Kagawa & David Selby, Plan Asia Regional Office, Bangkok, 2013.  137pp.

This report presents the findings of safe school research conducted in Cambodia, China and Indonesia, September 2012 to February 2013. The main objective of the research was to examine a child rights approach to school safety within the overall aim of ensuring children’s access to quality education.  Drawing on interviews with key stakeholders in Plan International’s participatory, rights-based approach to safe schools, Child Centered Disaster Risk Reduction (CCDRR), the report highlights key developments and achievements in the three countries at national and sub-national levels, identifying what is common and what is distinctive in the experiences of the three countries.  The research identifies a gap between the child rights participatory philosophy expounded by Plan and partner organizations and the majority of research participants for whom child participation is more or less a matter of children being active as they follow adult instruction.  It also finds that there is much to do in applying a child rights active participation philosophy to the engagement of marginalized children in safe school developments.  The report recommends developing synergies between disaster risk reduction initiatives and other initiatives aimed at quality education (e.g. child-friendly education, climate change education, life skills education).  It also calls for more thoroughgoing cross-curricular and through-the-grades attention to safety and risk reduction and greater grounding of teachers in facilitating participatory pedagogies so they are less reliant on a limited supply of handed down activities.  Current and potential roles of civil society organizations in supporting child rights-based safe school initiatives are identified.  A summary list of recommendations for each country as well as for Plan Asia generally concludes the report.

https://plan-international.org/publications/enhancing-child-centered-disaster-risk-reduction-safe-schools


Disaster Risk Reduction in School Curricula: Case Studies from Thirty Countries

By David Selby & Fumiyo Kagawa, UNESCO, Paris/UNICEF Geneva. 2012. 207pp.


Across thirty case studies, the study examines disciplinary, interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary manifestations of DRR in the curriculum, strategies for introducing disaster risk reduction into school curricula, pedagogies employed in teaching disaster risk reduction, teacher professional development, DRR learning outcomes and approaches to mainstreaming DRR in the school system. It is argued that DRR tends to appear in a narrow band of school subjects, typically the physical and natural sciences, with little horizontal integration or learning reinforcement across the curriculum. Vertical (through the grade levels) integration of DRR learning is likewise thin. Also, although DRR ambitions are oriented towards competency-building and learner engagement in and with the community, the limited use of participatory pedagogies rather stifles the ambition. Expressed aspirations notwithstanding, forms of learning assessment currently being employed do not lend themselves to measuring whether capacities and dispositions for disaster risk reduction are being cultivated but more or less adhere to traditional testing of knowledge. Systematic professional development directed towards developing the 'DRR facilitative and reflective practitioner' is called for. In short, while there are noteworthy examples of curriculum development, use of active pedagogies and successful movement to scale, there is still much to do if the commitment of the ISDR Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction to integrating DRR into school curricula worldwide by 2015 is to be realised.

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002170/217036e.pdf
http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/trainings-events/edu-materials/v.php?id=26470
http://www.educationandtransition.org/resources/unicefunesco-mapping-of-global-drr-integration-into-education-curricula-sustainability-frontiers/
http://www.ineesite.org/uploads/documents/store/DRR_in_school_curricula_-_mapping_30_countries.pdf

In Portuguese

http://www.unesco.org/ulis/cgi-bin/ulis.pl?catno=220517&set=51EB0F87_2_6&gp=1&lin=1&ll=1

In French

http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/bgdocs/inputs/Kagawa%20and%20Selby,%202014.pdf

 


Disaster Risk Reduction Education in Vanuatu: Pilot Curriculum Materials, Teachers' Guide and Evaluation Instruments

By Fumiyo Kagawa & David Selby, Save the Children Australia. Port Vila, Vanuatu, 2012 (May), 125pp.

The outcome of a consultancy undertaken by the Sustainability Frontiers team in April and early May 2012, the document was developed in preparation for a Save the Children/Ministry of Education pilot curriculum study involving ten primary schools on Efate Island, Vanuatu, to take place in June and July 2012.  It contains some twenty-five learning activities under three headings: Awareness-raising activities; Hazard-specific activities; Resilience-building activities. The activities include: brainstorming sessions; pair, small group and whole class discussion formats; experiential learning units; role play, drama and puppetry; in-the-field community learning; action learning within community partnerships for disaster risk reduction.  It also includes evaluation instruments for the pilot as well as instruments for assessing student learning.  Advice is given to teachers on classroom management and facilitation of the activities, their roles and responsibilities in data collection and evaluation, and on deploying the DRR student learning assessment instruments.

For the document, go to: http://www.savethechildren.org.au/images/content/where-we-work/vanuatu/Vanuatu_DRR_Curriculum_Activities_11May_20012.pdf



Disaster Risk Reduction Education in Vanuatu: A Baseline Study for Save the Children Australia

By Fumiyo Kagawa & David Selby, Save the Children Australia, Port Vila, Vanuatu,  2012 (April), 71pp.

The outcome of a consultancy undertaken by the Sustainability Frontiers team in March and April 2012, the study identifies utilized and unutilized windows of opportunity for disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) education within the present Vanuatu primary curriculum and the potential for DRR and CCA learning in the soon-to-be-launched reformed primary curriculum.  The present state of the art of disaster-related pedagogy in ten pilot schools is reviewed as are the perspectives of pilot school teachers and students on the quality and relevance of present and potential DRR/CCA curriculum, teachers and students all speaking to the importance of fuller and adequately resourced curriculum.  Policy, planning and implementation aspects are also considered, the study ending with a SWOT analysis of disaster risk reduction education in Vanuatu and recommendations for the upcoming Save the Children curriculum development project and for its June/July pilot phase (see above entry).


For the report, go to: http://www.savethechildren.org.au/images/content/where-we-work/vanuatu/Vanuatu_DRR_Curriculum_Baseline_2012.pdf




Building Capacity in Development Education Project: Phase 2 Evaluation.

By David Selby & Fumiyo Kagawa, Centre for Global Education, Belfast, 2010 (November), 87pp.

Building Capacity in Development Education Project: Phase 2 EvaluationThe outcome of an evaluation consultancy undertaken by a Sustainability Frontiers team, this report offers an in-depth evaluation of the second phase (2008-11) of the all-Ireland Building Capacity in Development Education Project of the Centre for Global Education, Belfast.  After the Executive Summary, there is an introduction giving the background to the project, a section on evaluation methodology, and then sections on the three project strands: the bi-annual education journal, Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review; the annual conference series; the bi-annual seminar series.  The report then stands away from the particular strands and looks at the project as a whole.  It ends with recommendations for strengthening each strand and the broader capacity building agenda of the project in the proposed third phase.  In the acknowledgements, the Centre for Global Education writes:  ‘We wish to extend our thanks to Sustainability Frontiers for the professionalism, courtesy and rigour that they have brought to the evaluation of the project and the presentation of the report’ (p.ii).

For the evaluation report, go to: http://www.centreforglobaleducation.com/node/62

 

 

 


Accessibility | Site Map | Copyright © 2017 Sustainability Frontiers | Designed by COSMIC